Technical reference and worked-example guide
PLC simulator capability documentation: field reference
Direct answer
The reader can translate a feature claim into a reproducible acceptance case and distinguish documented support from target-controller or production assumptions.
Written for learners, instructors, evaluators and technical buyers checking what the browser platform supports before choosing a task or comparing tools.
Definition
Capability name, user job, supported route, input, output, account boundary, browser context, evidence, known limitation and update date.
Signal path
Public claim through reachable interface, declared initial state, user action, observable result, retained artifact and documented limitation.
Worked example
One representative case per capability completed from a clean state with the published result.
Limits
Anonymous access, account tier, mobile viewport, unsupported syntax, invalid input, refresh, save, export and unavailable feature.
Common mistake
A documentation, access, interface, runtime, persistence, compatibility, browser or evidence mismatch.
Verification
Claims versioned with tests and corrected when product behavior or limitation changes.
How should software capabilities be verified?
Use a named public route, exact preconditions, one action and observable pass criteria; screenshots or feature labels alone are weak evidence.
Does a listed PLC capability mean vendor compatibility?
No. Check the explicit language, instruction, file, firmware and hardware boundaries before inferring compatibility with a vendor environment.