Sitelet https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/127949
Skip to content

Deprecate asyncio policy system #127949

Description

@kumaraditya303

asyncio's policy system deprecation

asyncio's policy system1 has been a source of confusion and problems in asyncio for a very long time. The policies no longer serve a real purpose. Loops are always per thread, there is no need to have a "current loop" when no loop is currently running. This issue discusses the changes to deprecate it in Python 3.14 and schedule its removal in 3.16 or later.

The usual user applications would use the runner APIs (see flowchart) while those who want more control like Jupyter project can create an event loop and manage it themselves, the difference would be that instead of them first getting the policy then event loop then can directly create it like

loop = MyCustomEventLoop()
loop.run_until_complete(task)

rather than currently

asyncio.set_event_loop_policy(MyPolicy())
policy = asyncio.get_event_loop_policy()
loop = policy.new_event_loop()
loop.run_until_complete(task)

See these discussions for more background:

Functions and classes to be deprecated and later removed
  • asyncio.get_event_loop_policy
  • asyncio.set_event_loop_policy
  • asyncio.AbstractEventLoopPolicy
  • asyncio.DefaultEventLoopPolicy
  • asyncio.WindowsSelectorEventLoopPolicy
  • asyncio.WindowsProactorEventLoopPolicy
  • asyncio.set_event_loop
Functions to be modified
  • asyncio.get_event_loop - In 3.16 or later this will become an alias to get_running_loop.
  • asyncio.new_event_loop - In 3.16 or later this will ignore custom policies and will be an alias to asyncio.EventLoop
  • asyncio.run & asyncio.Runner - In 3.16 or later this will be modified to not use policy system as that will be gone and rely solely on loop_factory.

The Grand Plan

  • To minimize changes, all the deprecated functions will be underscored i.e. set_event_loop -> _set_event_loop and set_event_loop will emit the warning then call _set_event_loop as its underlying implementation. This way internally asyncio can still call these functions until they are removed without need of many ignore warnings and the tests too can easily be adapted.
  • The deprecated classes will emit warnings when they are subclassed as it was done for child watchers.
  • The runner APIs will be remain unmodified but making sure that correct warnings are emitted internally when policy system is used.

The Future

---
title: Flowchart for asyncio.run
---
flowchart TD
    A["asyncio.run(coro, loop_factory=...)"] --> B{loop_factory}
    B -->|loop_factory is None| D{platform}
    B -->|loop_factory is not None| E["loop = loop_factory()"]
    D --> |Unix| F["loop = SelectorEventLoop()"]
    D --> |Windows| G["loop = ProactorEventLoop()"]
    E --> H
    F --> H
    G --> H 
    H["loop.run_until_complete(coro)"]
Loading

Linked PRs

Footnotes

  1. https://docs.python.org/3.14/library/asyncio-policy.html ↩

Activity

  1. added
    type-featureA feature request or enhancement
    and removed
    3.14bugs and security fixes
    on Dec 14, 2024
  2. self-assigned this
    on Dec 14, 2024
  3. graingert commented on Dec 14, 2024

    @graingert
    Contributor

    asyncio.new_event_loop could just be deprecated in favour of asyncio.EventLoop

  4. asvetlov commented on Dec 14, 2024

    @asvetlov
    Contributor

    I support the deprecation in general, details are the subject for future discussion.
    For example, policies are used by very many libraries. It's better for, e.g., maintainers of pytest-asyncio if we keep the deprecation for 5 Python releases (the issue proposes 2 years).
    Let me sleep on other proposed details.
    But anyway, I agree we should deprecate policies at least in a very soft form. If we agree on the 5 year deprecation period we can increase the pressure release-to-release

  5. graingert commented on Dec 15, 2024

    @graingert
    Contributor

    I support the deprecation in general, details are the subject for future discussion. For example, policies are used by very many libraries. It's better for, e.g., maintainers of pytest-asyncio if we keep the deprecation for 5 Python releases (the issue proposes 2 years). Let me sleep on other proposed details. But anyway, I agree we should deprecate policies at least in a very soft form. If we agree on the 5 year deprecation period we can increase the pressure release-to-release

    how about in 2 years (2 Python releases so 3.16 or 3.27) we swap the default loop_factory for asyncio.Runner and asyncio.run to loop_factory=asyncio.EventLoop This would allow policy users like pytest-asyncio to continue to use asyncio.get_event_loop() with the policy system, but would move most users off the system

  6. kumaraditya303 commented on Dec 15, 2024

    @kumaraditya303
    ContributorAuthor

    FTR, asyncio.get_event_loop 1 in Python versions 3.10.0–3.10.8 and 3.11.0, an incorrect deprecation was added for this but it was backed out later because things like asyncio.set_event_loop_policy weren't deprecated at that time.

    With the current plan all of this would be deprecated at the same time so there won't be any issue like that.

    Footnotes

    1. https://docs.python.org/3.11/library/asyncio-eventloop.html#asyncio.get_event_loop check the note ↩

  7. added a commit that references this issue on Dec 18, 2024
  8. 27 remaining items

  9. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Jan 8, 2025
  10. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 27, 2025
  11. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Mar 28, 2025
  12. SoundsSerious commented on Apr 29, 2026

    @SoundsSerious
  13. kumaraditya303 commented on Jun 21, 2026

    @kumaraditya303
    ContributorAuthor

    Reopening for the removal of APIs in 3.16

  14. moved this from Done to In Progress in asyncioon Jun 21, 2026
  15. added
    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
    on Jun 21, 2026
  16. added a commit that references this issue on Jun 27, 2026
  17. moved this from In Progress to Done in asyncioon Jun 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

extension-modulesC modules in the Modules dirstdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytopic-asynciotype-featureA feature request or enhancement

Projects

  • Status
    Done

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions