Sitelet https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/192#top
Skip to content

node-forward/node deactivation #192

Description

@19h

The TC addendum from 10 days ago mentions the node-forward/node repository:

6014f5c#diff-5f0aa123070e5ca6eb6c0ed9b4b3cc76R41

However, it is disabled now: ("This repository has been disabled.")

https://github.com/node-forward/node

Either this lacks a note or it went past me. Could you please clarify?

Thanks 🚶

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]node-forward/node[/-] [+]node-forward/node deactivation[/+] on Dec 21, 2014
  2. algesten commented on Dec 21, 2014

    @algesten

    the node-forward/node repository was disabled because when it was put out there, Joyent/Scott Hammond flagged it as a potential infringement of Joyent's trademarks. this is the whole reason for io.js being called "io.js"

  3. 19h commented on Dec 21, 2014

    @19h
    ContributorAuthor

    Well, I am aware of that. I was able to see both repos tho and it wasn't disabled. Additionally AFAIK Joyents trademark of Node was pulled thus not enforceable. .. So after all it was disabled due to Joyents' struggle against io.js independence? 😕

  4. algesten commented on Dec 22, 2014

    @algesten

    io.js was set up by Fedor Indutny, after node-forward/node was disabled. and Fedor also got the main contributors, who were behind node-forward/node, on board with io.js. Joyent has, as far as I know, not made any struggle against io.js. They discussed it in the node advisory board https://github.com/joyent/nodejs-advisory-board/blob/master/meetings/2014-12-04/minutes.md#iojs-fork-scott-hammond and decided that Scott Hammond is to draft "AB Position on io.js". Likewise they're looking to io.js for a statement on the relationship with joyent/node. Whether the goal is to merge back etc.

  5. mikeal commented on Dec 22, 2014

    @mikeal
    Contributor

    It was private, I created an Issue informing everyone that it was deprecated a while ago. We changed the plan on this org from Bronze to Free which disabled any private repos, that's why it now shows as "disabled."

  6. 19h commented on Dec 25, 2014

    @19h
    ContributorAuthor

    Thanks @mikeal for clearing up!

  7. added a commit that references this issue on May 5, 2025
  8. added a commit that references this issue on May 11, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions