Sitelet https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/pull/18540
Skip to content

tests/e2e: skip implement-NodePort ETP=Local test on calico+Azure - #18540

Merged
kubernetes-prow[bot] merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:masterfrom
hakman:skip-etp-local-calico-azure
Jul 5, 2026
Merged

kubernetes-prow[bot] merged 1 commit into
kubernetes:masterfrom
hakman:skip-etp-local-calico-azure

Conversation

@hakman

@hakman hakman commented Jul 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The "Services should implement NodePort and HealthCheckNodePort correctly when ExternalTrafficPolicy changes" test fails on calico on Azure for the same reason it does on GCE: the underlay cannot route the pod CIDR, so calico must encapsulate inter-node pod traffic (VXLAN vxlan.calico on Azure, IPIP tunl0 on GCE). On the node-local ExternalTrafficPolicy=Local NodePort short-circuit path the masquerade then rewrites the client source IP to the node's tunnel address (a pod-CIDR IP) instead of preserving it, so the test fails on every run once the cluster comes up.

/cc @rifelpet

The "Services should implement NodePort and HealthCheckNodePort correctly
when ExternalTrafficPolicy changes" test fails on calico on Azure for the
same reason it does on GCE: the underlay cannot route the pod CIDR, so calico
must encapsulate inter-node pod traffic (VXLAN vxlan.calico on Azure, IPIP
tunl0 on GCE). On the node-local ExternalTrafficPolicy=Local NodePort
short-circuit path the masquerade then rewrites the client source IP to the
node's tunnel address (a pod-CIDR IP) instead of preserving it, so the test
fails on every run once the cluster comes up.

Calico preserves the source IP only on AWS, where kOps disables the
source/dest check and routes pod traffic natively. Extend the calico skip
from gce to also cover azure.
@kubernetes-prow
kubernetes-prow Bot requested a review from rifelpet July 5, 2026 10:48
@kubernetes-prow kubernetes-prow Bot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jul 5, 2026
@kubernetes-prow kubernetes-prow Bot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 5, 2026
@kubernetes-prow

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rifelpet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubernetes-prow kubernetes-prow Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 5, 2026
@kubernetes-prow
kubernetes-prow Bot merged commit fa0d698 into kubernetes:master Jul 5, 2026
27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants