Is StorageService.load the right name?

Right now, to load a Blob into a byte array, we use the load method:

StorageService storage = ...;
bytes[] bytes = storage.load("bucket-name", "blob-name");

Is load the right verb for this? (Not saying it's wrong, just want to discuss this one here.)

Some of the options:

load (This is what it is today)
download
read
getBytes
readBytes

@jgeewax

@jgeewax , I don't think this belongs in this milestone as as I think the answer for this API questions would benefit from a wider set of opinions.

Can you clarify why? I think this belongs here because naming stuff is something relatively easy to discuss, and would make things a bit more stable once we have outsiders using the library.

In short, I think it's worth having and resolving this discussion before a public announcement.

As you can see, this issue is open for 21 days with no further comments/suggestions.
Clearly I liked "load" in this case (trying to make it clear that the complete content would be fetched and loaded into memory) and for that reason I names it as such.

I don't like download (which to me is more associated with save-to-disk) but I can live with read (though to me that normally is associated with a range/chunk rather than the complete content). I don't mind to change it to read (or its variants) but would that really be better? This is why I think we should wait until announced, so we can get more opinions...

Recapping the options based on your feedback:

load: Seems clear about the action, it's putting stuff to memory
download: I can agree that this tends to me "put to disk" so I can understand that.
read: I could go either way on this, not entirely sure.
getBytes: Seems like a very clear method name... I kind of like this one
loadBytes wasn't on the list, but I like this too.

I still don't know if we have enough to call this discussion "closed", would love to start crossing off the different options and getting a bit of feedback.