Repository navigation
Deprecate AsyncLoggingHandler? #1532
Description
Activity
Hmm I think I should actually switch the main one back to synchronous. I overlooked the separate asynchronous class which people can use. What I do think should be done though is to switch the example to suggest the asynchronous one because it will be more performant.
I think this needs to be cleaned up before GA.
We should delete this altogether, and support a setting for sync v async in the logging config.
Closed in #1716
Could the AsyncLoggingHandler be left as a deprecated extension of LoggingHandler, as that will make transitioning usage easier?
- added a commit that references this issue
on Oct 8, 2022 - added a commit that references this issue
on Dec 22, 2025 - added a commit that references this issue
on Jan 6, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Feb 24, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Mar 11, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Mar 12, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Mar 20, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Mar 30, 2026 - added a commit that references this issue
on Apr 1, 2026
The fix for #1386 has made the normal LoggingHandler asynchronous! Was this deliberate? If so, should the AsyncLoggingHandler be deprecated as it now no longer changes behaviour.