Conversation
| <option value="fadeInUpBig">fadeInUpBig</option> | ||
| </optgroup> | ||
|
|
||
| <optgroup label="Fading Exits"> |
|
Nice Idea! Great Job buddy! |
|
I do like this a lot, but it'll take a good time to review all the code. I do think that you'll have to adapt it for the new sass version. Will this even be possible? |
|
I can take care over it. |
|
Great @warengonzaga ! |
| </form> | ||
| <hr /> | ||
| <p class="meta"><a class="js--triggerSection" href="javascript:void(0);">Animate.css</a> or <a href="https://raw.github.com/daneden/animate.css/master/animate.css" download="animate.css">Download Animate.css</a> or <a href="//github.com/daneden/animate.css">View on GitHub</a></p> | ||
| <p><small>Developed by Igorxp5</small></p> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rather than adding credits for individuals, let's remove the credit here (and the one to myself on line 151) and provide a link to the project's contributors
daneden
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some comments:
- I don't think we need to add custom styles to the checkboxes—system styles will suffice and should shave off some CSS.
- The added CSS also has some inconsistencies with regard to browser prefixes. I don't think we need anything except the standard CSS properties; please remove all the prefixed properties!
- I can't remember what the purpose of the
testdirectory is. How certain are we that we need to update that directory? cc @eltonmesquita
- Removed checbox style. - Removed all browser prefixes on new css rules. - Removed chages on the test directory.
- Added a button to check all checkboxs.
|
Changed. @daneden |
|
Added all changes from latest version (Pull Request #720) |
|
It looks like there is a conflict. |
|
How can I solve this conflict? |
|
Sorri ! Can you parle Francais?
Sincères salutations
*Raouf MAÏZA*
2017-11-29 20:17 GMT+01:00 Igor Fernandes <notifications@github.com>:
… How can I solve this conflict?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#622 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AgVXY9dX-MJaMU-RR-mCenTlBmJuH02lks5s7a2_gaJpZM4Jdqwz>
.
|
|
I will try to help you to fix your conflict... |
|
Thank you. |
|
Hello, I'm gonna revise your work it seems too many errors in your code and I can't fix the code that's not my own. I will use your idea to make another one. You can contribute to it. Just fork it. I am having too many issue while updating your fork copy. |
|
Ok. It looks like the problem is only in |
|
Yup in the index.html you copy is outdated don't worry I'm gonna push your builder to the repo. I am creating it now.. |
|
Go here: #767 I made a new pull request with your code... |
|
I understand now, thank you. One question: Would have another way to fix this conflict, other than creating another repo? |
|
You just need to update your current repository and watch for updates in this repository. The trick is always to update your fork with the latest version of the original repository. |
|
I update the repo to the latest version by some git command? Because I tried copying whole file code and editing it again, changing where was necesary, but it didn't work. (Sorry for the amount of questions, I don't know much about git. After the answer I will close this pull request.) |
|
Let me give you the correct git command so you can update your fork into latest original copy or update: |
|
Very useful, thank you. |
Animate.css Builder Web Version
form > select.The Root Code ( not test ), is updated with the new animations.
Preview 1
Preview 2