Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 50 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Sign upGitHub is where the world builds software
Millions of developers and companies build, ship, and maintain their software on GitHub — the largest and most advanced development platform in the world.
brought snippets more into alignment with atom's language-python #94
Conversation
|
Merged! Thank you! |
|
Just released v1.0.11 with your patch in it. |
|
Awesome! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Resubmitting #92 for newest master.
I created this pull request to bring MagicPython's snippets back in line with the ones in Atom's language-python package.
In accordance with the advice from this closed pull request I got the additions folded into language-python first (see here).
Originally I was only going to add my "env3" and "sc" snippets but when I saw that the language-python package was ahead I went on and added import, from/import, with statement, rPDB, and PuDB.
Potential Issues
This brings the atom snippets out of alignment with the sublime snippets. I'm not good enough with sublime-snippet yet so I hope that someone else writes that up soon.