Simplify fork choice spec #2092
Merged
Conversation
This change should be non-substantive as any blocks in `blocks` should be descendants (inclusive) of the `store.justified_checkpoint` (refer `get_filtered_block_tree`) so that in `get_head` all blocks considered as potential heads will have `slot > justified_slot`. Considering this condition universally applies, adding the `and ...` arm to the conditional is unnecessary overhead.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
This change should be non-substantive as any blocks in
blocksshould be descendants (inclusive) of thestore.justified_checkpoint(referget_filtered_block_tree) so that inget_headall blocks considered as potential heads will haveslot > justified_slot. Considering this condition universally applies, adding theand ...arm to the conditional is unnecessary overhead.