Non-Blocking Review Concern: Historical planning doc still references the old action SHA
Source: pre-push whole-codebase review
Location: docs/plans/2026-03-06-centralize-claude-assistant.md:78
Date: 2026-08-16
What was flagged
The file contains a code snippet example with anthropics/claude-code-action@26ec041249acb0a944c0a47b6c0c13f05dbc5b44 # v1, which is the SHA just replaced by this diff. This is a planning document (not a live workflow), so it poses no runtime risk. However, stale SHAs in example snippets create mild confusion when someone reads the doc and compares it to the actual workflows. Consider updating it alongside future pin bumps, or adding a note that snippets may lag the current pin.
Context
This issue was automatically created from a non-blocking concern identified
during pre-push whole-codebase review. It was flagged for tracking.
Created by lib-review-issues.sh
Non-Blocking Review Concern: Historical planning doc still references the old action SHA
Source: pre-push whole-codebase review
Location:
docs/plans/2026-03-06-centralize-claude-assistant.md:78Date: 2026-08-16
What was flagged
The file contains a code snippet example with
anthropics/claude-code-action@26ec041249acb0a944c0a47b6c0c13f05dbc5b44 # v1, which is the SHA just replaced by this diff. This is a planning document (not a live workflow), so it poses no runtime risk. However, stale SHAs in example snippets create mild confusion when someone reads the doc and compares it to the actual workflows. Consider updating it alongside future pin bumps, or adding a note that snippets may lag the current pin.Context
This issue was automatically created from a non-blocking concern identified
during pre-push whole-codebase review. It was flagged for tracking.
Created by lib-review-issues.sh