Summary
The high-level TypeScript SDK cannot authenticate ACP adapters whose advertised authentication methods differ from the three method IDs hard-coded in autoAuthenticate. It also does not expose a public way to send an arbitrary ACP authenticate request or advertise authentication-related client capabilities.
This currently breaks the official Codex adapter 1.x API-key flow and prevents clients from using the official Claude/Codex custom gateway authentication flow through the high-level SDK.
Versions tested
- sandbox-agent: 0.4.2
- acp-http-client: 0.4.2
- @agentclientprotocol/sdk: 0.16.1
- @agentclientprotocol/codex-acp: 1.10.0
The same hard-coded authentication logic is still present on main at the time of filing.
Current behavior
LiveAcpConnection.create() initializes the ACP connection and calls a private autoAuthenticate() helper. That helper only considers:
codex-api-key
openai-api-key
anthropic-api-key
Current Codex ACP 1.x advertises:
[
{ "id": "api-key" },
{ "id": "chat-gpt" }
]
As a result, the high-level SDK does not call authenticate, and session creation fails with Authentication required (or an equivalent wrapped ACP error), even when CODEX_API_KEY or OPENAI_API_KEY is available to the adapter process.
The high-level SDK also does not expose its AcpHttpClient, a generic authenticate(request) method, or an authentication callback. Consumers therefore cannot recover by selecting the advertised method themselves.
The authentication call is also best-effort and its error is swallowed, which makes diagnostics difficult.
Claude/custom gateway case
The maintained Claude ACP adapter advertises its gateway auth method only when the client sends the corresponding capability during initialize:
{
"clientCapabilities": {
"auth": {
"_meta": {
"gateway": true
}
}
}
}
The client must then send an explicit request such as:
{
"methodId": "gateway",
"_meta": {
"gateway": {
"baseUrl": "https://gateway.example.com",
"headers": {
"Authorization": "Bearer <redacted>"
}
}
}
}
The low-level acp-http-client supports both operations. The high-level SDK currently supplies no authentication-related clientCapabilities during initialization and provides no way to issue the explicit authentication request.
Minimal reproduction
- Start an official sandbox-agent 0.4.2 server.
- Install or use @agentclientprotocol/codex-acp 1.10.0.
- Make CODEX_API_KEY available to the adapter process.
- Connect with the high-level sandbox-agent TypeScript SDK.
- Create a Codex session.
Observed initialize response:
{
"authMethods": [
{ "id": "api-key", "name": "API Key" },
{ "id": "chat-gpt", "name": "ChatGPT" }
]
}
Observed result: session creation fails because no authentication method is selected.
Using the official low-level acp-http-client against the same server succeeds when calling:
await client.authenticate({ methodId: "api-key" });
Expected behavior
The high-level SDK should allow applications to handle the authentication methods advertised by the active adapter, without depending on a fixed list of adapter-specific method IDs.
Possible API shapes include:
- Expose a public authenticate(agent, request) or connection-level authenticate(request) method.
- Accept clientCapabilities and an authentication selector or callback in the connection options.
- Optionally retain automatic authentication for known environment-backed methods, but derive it from advertised method metadata and keep aliases for older adapters.
- Surface authentication failures instead of silently swallowing them, or expose them through a diagnostic callback.
Compatibility concern
sandbox-agent install-agent normally resolves adapters from the live ACP registry. Adapter versions therefore evolve independently of the high-level SDK release. A hard-coded method-ID list can become incompatible even when both components are installed through their documented, official paths.
Related
Summary
The high-level TypeScript SDK cannot authenticate ACP adapters whose advertised authentication methods differ from the three method IDs hard-coded in autoAuthenticate. It also does not expose a public way to send an arbitrary ACP authenticate request or advertise authentication-related client capabilities.
This currently breaks the official Codex adapter 1.x API-key flow and prevents clients from using the official Claude/Codex custom gateway authentication flow through the high-level SDK.
Versions tested
The same hard-coded authentication logic is still present on main at the time of filing.
Current behavior
LiveAcpConnection.create() initializes the ACP connection and calls a private autoAuthenticate() helper. That helper only considers:
Current Codex ACP 1.x advertises:
[ { "id": "api-key" }, { "id": "chat-gpt" } ]As a result, the high-level SDK does not call authenticate, and session creation fails with Authentication required (or an equivalent wrapped ACP error), even when CODEX_API_KEY or OPENAI_API_KEY is available to the adapter process.
The high-level SDK also does not expose its AcpHttpClient, a generic authenticate(request) method, or an authentication callback. Consumers therefore cannot recover by selecting the advertised method themselves.
The authentication call is also best-effort and its error is swallowed, which makes diagnostics difficult.
Claude/custom gateway case
The maintained Claude ACP adapter advertises its gateway auth method only when the client sends the corresponding capability during initialize:
{ "clientCapabilities": { "auth": { "_meta": { "gateway": true } } } }The client must then send an explicit request such as:
{ "methodId": "gateway", "_meta": { "gateway": { "baseUrl": "https://gateway.example.com", "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer <redacted>" } } } }The low-level acp-http-client supports both operations. The high-level SDK currently supplies no authentication-related clientCapabilities during initialization and provides no way to issue the explicit authentication request.
Minimal reproduction
Observed initialize response:
{ "authMethods": [ { "id": "api-key", "name": "API Key" }, { "id": "chat-gpt", "name": "ChatGPT" } ] }Observed result: session creation fails because no authentication method is selected.
Using the official low-level acp-http-client against the same server succeeds when calling:
Expected behavior
The high-level SDK should allow applications to handle the authentication methods advertised by the active adapter, without depending on a fixed list of adapter-specific method IDs.
Possible API shapes include:
Compatibility concern
sandbox-agent install-agent normally resolves adapters from the live ACP registry. Adapter versions therefore evolve independently of the high-level SDK release. A hard-coded method-ID list can become incompatible even when both components are installed through their documented, official paths.
Related