I think this would be useful at least in the node.js context. Build and maintenance scripts and so on could then be expressed using purescript and simply run, while still retaining the ability to call into any relevant JS libraries. I just wanted to bring this up for discussion, I have not put any thought into how this would actually work.
For what it's worth here was the RFC to add a "script" command to stack: commercialhaskell/stack#2805.
This issue was moved here from purescript/purescript#2883
I think this would be useful at least in the node.js context. Build and maintenance scripts and so on could then be expressed using purescript and simply run, while still retaining the ability to call into any relevant JS libraries. I just wanted to bring this up for discussion, I have not put any thought into how this would actually work.
For what it's worth here was the RFC to add a "script" command to stack: commercialhaskell/stack#2805.
This issue was moved here from purescript/purescript#2883