Repository navigation
Order docs alphabetically #393
Description
Activity
A little bit trivial, but it doesn't make any sense to have the list in alphabetical order but the all page be in... seemingly random order. I don't think there'd be any side effects to this, @MattMS.
👍
Cool. Well #553 is my first step to see if anyone else is interested.
- addeddocIssues and PRs related to Node.js documentation.Issues and PRs related to Node.js documentation.
on Jan 22, 2015 - added a commit that references this issue
on Jan 23, 2015 - addeddiscussIssues opened for discussion and feedback.Issues opened for discussion and feedback.and removed
on Jan 30, 2015 @MattMS I think this got merged and we can close it, right?
@robertkowalski the pull request where the change was proposed was closed in favor of waiting how things go forward in joyent/node
@robertkowalski the pull request where the change was proposed was closed in favor of waiting how things go forward in joyent/node
@MattMS @brendanashworth hmm... I don't see a PR at joyent/node...
From #740 it sounds like (the idea of) #553 would be fine now, right?
@MattMS I think you are probably right that as #740 landed docs will be hard to merge anyway. @brendanashworth what do you think?
I'm +1 on just pushing ahead with improving docs even if it means making it hard to merge stuff. In reality, there's not a whole lot of docs work going on in joyent/node, most of it is happening here. The improved docs situation here is a benefit to the whole community. node-forward y'all.
+1 what @rvagg.
There is already so much changes to the docs anyway, so this will probably only be one of many problems if you wants to merge those branches.
I am also +1 and would merge tomorrow if no one objects
All sounds great to me 😄
I'm happy to spend some time reordering docs and making PRs referenced here.
It'll be in a few hours though, after I finish work.- addedgood first issueIssues that are suitable for first-time contributors.Issues that are suitable for first-time contributors.and removeddiscussIssues opened for discussion and feedback.Issues opened for discussion and feedback.
on Jun 8, 2015 @chrisdickinson could you take this up to discuss in the docs WG?
Ok so, the main concern here was that we'd have conflicts pulling over joyent/node doc changes.
Since we are now the authoritative source, it's not really an issue anymore. I think we should go ahead with this.
cc @nodejs/documentation
Formal +1
👍 from me too.
Should I redo #553 with the current docs?
@MattMS Sure! :)
+1
Pull request for reordered fs at #2432
I closed #2432 to wait for further discussion and confirmation on the best ordering/grouping to use.
Ref to nodejs/doc-tool#3 (comment).
This can be closed now! :)
Thank you @tflanagan for doing the work!
Would it be possible to have the docs Markdown files ordered alphabetically to make it easier to use as a reference?
I am happy to do work towards this but I am not familiar enough with the documentation process to know if there would be any side-effects, such as with the JSON output.