Sitelet https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/2515
Skip to content

[Converge] child_process argument type checking #2515

Description

@rvagg

Continuing from nodejs/node-convergence-archive#22, I don't believe this has been done yet, @jasnell can you confirm please? That thread seems to have enough agreement to pull these changes in. Marking on the 4.0.0 milestone.

These commits add argument type checking to methods within child_process. This needs to be reconciled with the current io.js behavior. The change introduces a new throw so there's a potential API compatibility issue.
/cc @trevnorris

Activity

  1. added this to the 4.0.0 milestone on Aug 24, 2015
  2. added
    child_processIssues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem.
    on Aug 24, 2015
  3. jasnell commented on Aug 24, 2015

    @jasnell
    Member

    Correct, AFAIK this has not yet been completed. It's actually on my list for later this week but if someone gets to it before then ..... ;-)

  4. jasnell commented on Aug 24, 2015

    @jasnell
    Member

    @sam-github @trevnorris ... this particular set of commits were yours originally, I believe. Would either of you be able to take a look to see what needs to land in nodejs/node?

  5. trevnorris commented on Aug 24, 2015

    @trevnorris
    Contributor

    lint fix doesn't matter. processing the arguments the same would be helpful, but not sure if it's currently done that way ATM. so may be worth bringing in.

  6. rvagg commented on Aug 25, 2015

    @rvagg
    MemberAuthor

    @trevnorris I'm assigning this to you, please close this when it lands, before the end of the week please.

  7. trevnorris commented on Aug 25, 2015

    @trevnorris
    Contributor

    @rvagg want me to just cherry-pick the applicable onto master?

  8. rvagg commented on Aug 25, 2015

    @rvagg
    MemberAuthor

    @trevnorris your call, including assessing whether this is even necessary, PR obviously even if cherry-picking.

  9. rvagg commented on Aug 30, 2015

    @rvagg
    MemberAuthor

    ping @trevnorris, are we close here?

  10. jasnell commented on Sep 2, 2015

    @jasnell
    Member

    @rvagg @trevnorris ... I'm going to take a look at this today. I'll port over the changes and open a new PR against master

  11. rvagg commented on Sep 5, 2015

    @rvagg
    MemberAuthor

    closed by #2667 I believe

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

child_processIssues and PRs related to the child_process subsystem.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions