I've been skimming through the travis logs and found one error that looked ... interesting:
https://travis-ci.org/fsprojects/Paket/jobs/266475236#L1953
It comes from this line:
|
let internal memoizeAsyncEx (f: 'iext -> 'i -> Async<'o * 'oext>) = |
|
let cache = System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary<'i, System.Threading.Tasks.Task<'o>>() |
|
let handle (ex:'iext) (x:'i) : Choice<System.Threading.Tasks.Task<'o>, Async<'o * 'oext>> = |
|
//fun (ex:'iext) (x: 'i) -> // task.Result serialization to sync after done. |
|
let mutable result = None |
|
let mutable wasAdded = false |
|
let task = cache.GetOrAdd(x, fun x -> |
|
wasAdded <- true |
|
async { |
|
let! o, oext = f ex x |
|
result <- Some oext |
|
return o |
|
} |> Async.StartAsTask) // |> Async.AwaitTask |
|
if not wasAdded then |
|
Choice1Of2 task |
|
else |
|
async { |
|
let! res = task |> Async.AwaitTask |
|
match result with |
|
| Some ext -> return res, ext |
|
| None -> return failwithf "Expected an result at this place." |
Just judging from the context, it seems like this should not happen and represents either a mono async issue, or an actual bug. But I haven't analyzed it in any way.
If you don't care about this, just close the issue ;-)
I've been skimming through the travis logs and found one error that looked ... interesting:
https://travis-ci.org/fsprojects/Paket/jobs/266475236#L1953
It comes from this line:
Paket/src/Paket.Core/Common/Utils.fs
Lines 62 to 82 in ca538da
Just judging from the context, it seems like this should not happen and represents either a mono async issue, or an actual bug. But I haven't analyzed it in any way.
If you don't care about this, just close the issue ;-)