Codeberg/Documentation
Codeberg/Documentation
Watch
43
213
Fork
You've already forked Documentation
 169
Code Issues 74 Pull requests 15 Wiki Activity

Clarify that Codeberg/Community is also monitored by staff #645

New issue
Open
opened 2025-07-20 21:48:01 +02:00 by n0toose · 0 comments
n0toose commented 2025-07-20 21:48:01 +02:00
Member
Copy link

The confusion that arose here means that we should be more clear that Codeberg/Community is monitored by other community members and staff (experienced volunteers, admins) alike: Codeberg/org#1227

The confusion that arose here means that we should be more clear that `Codeberg/Community` is monitored by other community members and staff (experienced volunteers, admins) alike: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/issues/1227
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag specified
Branches Tags
main
renovate/pnpm-11.x
renovate/prettier-3.x
renovate/cspell-monorepo
renovate/codeberg.org-gedankenstuecke-git-pages-woodpecker-plugin
ci_pr_close_no_preview
pr-554
pr/554
gitea-icons-shortcode
No results found.
Labels
Clear labels   
Codeberg Pages
Issues affecting Codeberg Pages

  
Documentation Usability
Issues related to using and reading docs.codeberg.org

  
Forgejo

   
Good First Issue! 👋

   
Kind: Bug

   
Kind: Documentation

   
Kind: Enhancement

   
Kind: Feature

   
Kind: Question

   
Kind: Security

   
Licensing

   
Part: Generator
This is related to the generation of the documentation, not to the content itself

  
Priority: High
The priority is high

  
Priority: Low
The priority is low

  
Priority: Medium
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed: Confirmed
Something has been confirmed

  
Reviewed: Duplicate
Something exists already

  
Reviewed: Invalid
Something was marked as invalid

  
Reviewed: Wontfix
Something won't be fixed

  
Status: Blocked

   
Status: Help wanted
Contributions are welcome!

  
Status: In progress
Work is in progress

  
Status: Needs feedback
Feedback is needed

  
Status: Ready for Review
Work is completed

  
Status: Review
Review is in progress / Reviewers wanted

  
Status: Stale
No labels
Codeberg Pages
Documentation Usability
Forgejo
Good First Issue! 👋
Kind: Bug
Kind: Documentation
Kind: Enhancement
Kind: Feature
Kind: Question
Kind: Security
Licensing
Part: Generator
Priority: High
Priority: Low
Priority: Medium
Reviewed: Confirmed
Reviewed: Duplicate
Reviewed: Invalid
Reviewed: Wontfix
Status: Blocked
Status: Help wanted
Status: In progress
Status: Needs feedback
Status: Ready for Review
Status: Review
Status: Stale
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
Codeberg/Documentation#645
No description provided.